Arguments against theistic evolution: Difference between revisions

From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
→‎If evolution was a part of how God created: adding more info making more clear
(→‎If evolution was a part of how God created: adding more info making more clear)
Line 100: Line 100:


[[Theistic evolution]] cannot draw a person to [[Christ]], when the main foundation of it denies the supernatural to even exist. This is why [[God]] the Father will not draw anyone unto the Son through the teaching of this theory. For if it had any [[God]] drawing power what so ever, would not it be used for that?  
[[Theistic evolution]] cannot draw a person to [[Christ]], when the main foundation of it denies the supernatural to even exist. This is why [[God]] the Father will not draw anyone unto the Son through the teaching of this theory. For if it had any [[God]] drawing power what so ever, would not it be used for that?  
Examples:
# Having the drawing power unto Christ means that [[evolution]] also has the approval of God the Father for this purpose.
# Not having the drawing power means that it is not approved of by God the Father for the purpose of bringing souls unto the kingdom
# What is accepted by God the Father ([[creation]]) has brought many into the kingdom. What is rejected ([[evolution]]) has not.
   
   
{{Bible quote|book=Matthew|chap=7|verses=16|version=KJV|Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?}}
{{Bible quote|book=Matthew|chap=7|verses=16|version=KJV|Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?}}

Navigation menu