Arguments against theistic evolution: Difference between revisions

From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
(Building page)
Line 97: Line 97:
If evolution was a part of how God created, then it could be used as a gospel subject to accomplish these things:
If evolution was a part of how God created, then it could be used as a gospel subject to accomplish these things:
# Holding bible studies to learn more about God.
# Holding bible studies to learn more about God.
# Having theistic evolution cursades to bring more souls to Christ.
# Having theistic evolution crusades to bring more souls to Christ.
# Having theistic evolution missionaries to spread the word about Christ around the world.
# Having theistic evolution missionaries to spread the word about Christ around the world.
# Street corner theistic evlutionist preachers.
# Street corner theistic evolutionist preachers.
# Tracts that show how theistic evolution can bring you to Christ.
# Tracts that show how theistic evolution can bring you to Christ.
These things do not exists because evolution itself can never be used to promote God, because what is the opposite of God cannot be used.
These things do not exists because evolution itself can never be used to promote God, because what is the opposite of God cannot be used.
Line 114: Line 114:
|}
|}
Good fruit, which is a sign of God's approval, cannot be produced by something God does not approve of. And therefore His drawing power will not be in it either.
Good fruit, which is a sign of God's approval, cannot be produced by something God does not approve of. And therefore His drawing power will not be in it either.
== Related References ==
== Related References ==


Navigation menu