creationist
4,563
edits
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
* - The Nephilim reappearing (because the flood killed "all flesh" minus 8 souls) really rests on an untrustworthy report from unfaithful men designed to strike fear into minds and hearts of the men and women of Israel. I don't think this is a reliable enough to say dogmatically new Nephilim can into being. Genesis 10 documents the genealogy of mankind. There was no mention of fallen angels (the "sons of God") re-mating with women ever again. I feel for new Nephilim to have appeared I have missed something in the Bible; something huge. Would that make the Great Flood of Noah's day somewhat pointless too? Your thoughts. --[[User:Anaccuratesource|Anaccuratesource]] 19:25, 9 July 2012 (PDT) | * - The Nephilim reappearing (because the flood killed "all flesh" minus 8 souls) really rests on an untrustworthy report from unfaithful men designed to strike fear into minds and hearts of the men and women of Israel. I don't think this is a reliable enough to say dogmatically new Nephilim can into being. Genesis 10 documents the genealogy of mankind. There was no mention of fallen angels (the "sons of God") re-mating with women ever again. I feel for new Nephilim to have appeared I have missed something in the Bible; something huge. Would that make the Great Flood of Noah's day somewhat pointless too? Your thoughts. --[[User:Anaccuratesource|Anaccuratesource]] 19:25, 9 July 2012 (PDT) | ||
* - If Canaan's (K'naan) descendants were Nephilim. Where to Christ Jesus, David come into play they descend from Rahab a | * - If Canaan's (K'naan) descendants were Nephilim. Where to Christ Jesus, David come into play they descend from Rahab a Canaanitess. --[[User:Anaccuratesource|Anaccuratesource]] 19:36, 9 July 2012 (PDT) |