User:Arturo
| Arturo Subercaseaux Cooper | |
|---|---|
File:Arturo subercaseaux.jpg Autoretrato, by Arturo Subercaseaux | |
| Student, writer | |
| Born | May 1st, 1990 |
Arturo #7 (ca. May 1st, 1990), is best known as a chilean boy who dedicates most of its time in radio broadcasting and book writing.
Life
Born from chilean parents in May 1st 1990. Since he was a little kid he astonished everyone with his scientific lifestyle, always trying to prove everything. In December 27st 2004 the Subercaseaux family went back to Chile and Arturo was inscribed in Alonso de Ercilla Institute were he studied for a year and then he was changed to Cambridge High School were he is currently studying in.
Philosophy
His philosophy for life is based on skepticism. Perhaps being a creationist christian, he always doubt everything, from the 6-Day Creation account in the Genesis to the factual truth behing the Big Bang theory and stuff like that. In his book Laws of Knowledge he developed 3 fundamental laws for any knowledge about the universe. They're refered to as the Epistemic Laws of Knowledge and perhaps not being published yet they have got a lot of adherents to it.
- First Epistemic Law of Dicotomy
Establishes that every form of question can be answered as a dicotomy and the mixture of both concepts. For example, on the origin of the universe you got the Creationism, the naturist evolution and its mixture: theistic evolution.
- Second Epistemic Law of Causality
Every single form of knowledge in the world has a cause. It's senseless to dismiss any form of knowledge because they all have a reason to be.
- Third Epistemic Law of Doubtness
Every single answer must be doubted to verify its truth. If you believe in something without questioning it, you can't affirm it to be truth.
Creationism
On March 2006 Arturo started questioning the evolutionary proccesses involving the developing of ape-like being into humans during history classes where he was assigned for investigation of prehistoric humans.
While reading about the evolutionary theories he noticed a substantial failure: most of them have been debunked and proved wrong. So then, why did science accept it as true? While being more and more fundamentalist, he found on the dilemma of the Genesis account for creation. He passed from evolutionary theism to day-age creationism, but then he got to S8int and then to creationist pages and he then converted to biblical christianity. Then he started working against evolution by writing 'Encyclopaedia Arturica', a encyclopedia-like project on science and religion debates, ranging from creationism to japhetic theory.
Currently he's adding minor edits to the Epistemic Laws of Knowledge, which claim evolution to be as plausible as gravity, creationism and mirror matter because they all cannot be proved right and could eventually proved wrong.
To do
Articles I'm currently working on
