Talk:Why Evolution is a Fraud

I fixed the link. I don't usually edit pages directly but in this case thought it was (i) acceptable, and (ii) useful.

As for the article, this: "I decided to research evolution and see how it stood up on its own." disagrees drastically with the list of sources given at [1]. Researching an idea requires being familiar with the arguments of those proposing it, but instead of Darwin, Diamond, Jones, Gould etc the pro-evolution works on that list consist of a biology textbook and Genetics for dummies. Roy 07:49, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Needed: a review

Roy, why not expand the article to include a description of your work?--Temlakos^Talk 11:47, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Insufficient permission. Roy 13:04, 9 November 2007 (EST)