Talk:Three heavens

I'll come back later to finish this.Ikester7579 07:04, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Probably best not to abbreviate Bible references - 2 Corinthians 12:2. --Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

This subject is hard to put into words where everyone can understand it. I will do my best to keep it simple. Because it is easy to get lost in reading this. So if clarification is needed some where, please point it out.Ikester7579 03:16, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

Just a minor notice

Hello, I really enjoyed this article. It’s my favorite by you I have read. I basically agree with you, but just use different terms. I believe in there being more then more region of Hell and put heavy weight on the concept of Shoul. But I must point out a few things.

Under the section “The First Heaven”, I think the term heaven means more like Space, thus I don’t think this can be considered evidence. But I think this is only a minor error.

The main I’m posting this is that you heavily error on Biblical evidence.

For example, 1 kings 8:27 “But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven (1) and heaven (2) of heavens (3) cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded?“

This only talks about TWO heavens, not three. The term heavens of heavens is talking about one place, because one is describing the other.

You may be right on the 1 kings issue. Any other opinions on this? As far as the space deals goes, when I do the page on the four firmaments, this should answer your question.

Come to think of it, considering the bible never says that God Himself ever visited Hell. Including the third heaven as a place that cannot contain thee. Would be wrong. Unless it is speaking of Christ.

Ikester7579 02:10, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

I removed 1 Kings 8:27. If someone has a defense for it to be put back as being evidence for the three heavens, I'd like to hear it.Ikester7579 05:52, 6 July 2007 (EDT)