Talk:The woodpecker tongue couldn't have evolved (Talk.Origins)
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
The template is not complete. The Talk Origins claim needs to be in blue. It confused me. :-) --EriK 17:37, 1 September 2010 (PDT)
- Go ahead and fix it up.--Tony 19:31, 1 September 2010 (PDT)
No offense to anyone but I'm a creationist and even I think that this is kind of a fail response D:. I personally don't know anything about woodpeckers, is there anyone here who does and who can provide a more thorough rebuttal? Shinydarkrai94 21:57, 1 September 2010 (PDT)
- We don't need to even engage in this little quibble. I think we should clearly indicate that creationists find no threat in any way how the woodpecker managed to evolve this biological system. We do however disagree with the extrapolation of the present phenotype expressions, seen to produce through mutations and natural selection, into the past to prove VAST leaps of change not consistent with observation.--Tony 22:59, 1 September 2010 (PDT)