The Creation Wiki is made available by the NW Creation Network
Watch monthly live webcast - Like us on Facebook - Subscribe on YouTube

Talk:RATE Group

From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to: navigation, search
Please observe discussion policy and use talk pages only for reviewing articles.

The RATE group has come under criticism by non creationists. They claim that the RATE group is poor in it's research. For example, it is said that in this[1] article, the RATE group has not gone into enough detail and was too vague. And they also criticize it for the way it was dated. To quote from a Professor of Planetary Science/Physics who also happens to be a christian :

Look at the regular science papers Snelling cites at the end of his article, look at the differences in how things are stated and written. You will find instead of vague comments about outcrops and we sent samples to a lab - detailed explanations of the techniques performed and what they were performed on. Details about the minerals selected and why. Details on the dating methods employed. Listings and plots of all the data and the analysis method on that data.

This isn't discussing off topic debates, IMO this is a legitimate criticism on the RATE group, and if you say that this is just some off topic discussion of it, then fine, by all means delete this.

RichardT 14:43 7 January 2007 (EST)

Yes, the RATE team has certainly gone under some serious attacks and this especially is the case on talkorigins. However, i haven't read the book so there's really no answer i could provide at the moment. It wouldn't be surprising that there are some dishonest attacks on the group itself. Both sides of the battle seems rather fierce. --Gil 17:04, 7 January 2007 (EST)

Yes it wouldn't surprise me either if the atacks were dishonest, because atheists wouldn't be able to stand it if the RATE group findings were accurate. The only problem I have with this conclusion is that the RATE group is comming under critisism by fellow christians...

RichardT 18:10, 7 January 2007 (EST)

Ah, so those christians probably either believe in OEC or evolution. You know, there seems to be an increasing amount of people like those. At least this is how things seem to be. For questions such as these, have you tried join CreationTalk?--Gil 18:40, 7 January 2007 (EST)

Yes, I'm waiting to be accepted.

RichardT 18:45, 7 January 2007 (EST)

RATE online book doesn't work

The pdf file for the Rate online book can't open with acrobat reader for me, is anyone else getting this problem, can it be fixed? (I'll try to download the latest version of acrobat reader)

-- RichardTTalk 18:12, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

I have downloaded the latest version of acrobat reader, it still doesn't work. I really want to read it.

-- RichardTTalk 18:23, 20 July 2007 (EDT)