Talk:Logical fallacy (EvoWiki)

Post comment,
or browse more talk.

Please observe discussion policy and use talk pages only for reviewing articles.

Evowiki responds

The Evowiki has.. "replied" .. to our page. PrometheusX303 17:42, 10 April 2006 (GMT)

"Logical" fallacies?

The article opens with:

EvoWiki has compiled a long list of logical fallacies[1]. Some of the listed fallacies are indeed logical fallacies (like Ad hominem). Others are not...

But the EvoWiki page is headed "Fallacies", not "Logical Fallacies", and the body of the page is consistent with that. On what grounds do we make the claim in the quote above? Or do we need to rename the page and alter the introduction?
Philip J. Rayment 09:42, 20 April 2006 (GMT)

Good point. Article needs a slight re-write. PrometheusX303 13:19, 20 April 2006 (GMT)

Page Needs Revision

I think that this page should be revised to make it easier to follow the debate between the two Logical Fallacy pages.  And to respond to what's actually on the EvoWiki page. TChapman500 12:21, 24 March 2013 (PDT)