Talk:Behemoth, from the book of Job, was a dinosaur (Talk.Origins)

Re: "The fact is that it is Behemoth's tail and no other body part that is compared to a cedar tree. This means that the best interpretation of the verses is that Behemoth was a Sauropod dinosaur."

Only if you selectively focus on one verse and conveniently forget that sauropods also had 'necks like cedars, ignore that they had relatively small mouths, and gloss over the reference to stones. Hippos and crocodiles fit the description equally well. Roy 17:05, 9 Dec 2004 (GMT)

They may have had relatively small mouths, but that is compared to their own size. Their mouths were still large. Crocodiles don't eat grass. (Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.) "Stones" refers to "thighs". I have heard the claim that they are "testicles", but testicles don't have sinews. PrometheusX303 18:50, 10 January 2006 (GMT)