Search results

From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • ...by not raising questions about the [[evolutionary dating methods|dating of fossils]] and by not questioning reconstructions, except when enough available foss ...nt the same [[created kind]] are not transitional but coexisting varieties of the same created kind, but this issue is '''not''' raised in the following
    3 KB (375 words) - 17:41, 15 April 2017
  • ...een [[reptiles]] and [[mammals]], with no [[transitional form|transitional fossils]] between them. ...Origins has chosen the worst possible source for this. Not only is it out of date but it is generally a poor quality source.
    3 KB (508 words) - 13:30, 8 August 2020
  • ...ry theory, for a variety of nonscientific reasons, has obtained the status of sacred revelation. To express doubts by bringing up the counterevidence to ...of it, there have been several significant revisions of important aspects of it…
    3 KB (517 words) - 03:07, 8 August 2020
  • : There are no transitional fossils between reptiles and birds. ...equence to pieces. It is only possible to get an evolutionary sequence out of this if one assumes evolution.
    13 KB (1,791 words) - 22:25, 29 August 2014
  • '''Response to [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part2b.html#lag Lagomorphs]''' ...Barunlestes'' similarity to mice it is reasonable to consider it a variety of mouse.
    5 KB (816 words) - 02:41, 12 June 2010
  • Talk.Origins gives a list of the typical so-called evidences for [[evolution]]. Note, however, that even ...ts in all of the following different forms (Theobald 2004). Each new piece of evidence tests the rest.}}
    11 KB (1,658 words) - 20:44, 5 March 2017
  • '''Response to [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part1a.html#fish Transition from primitive jawless fish to sharks, skates, ...information. So, we don't know which jawless fish was the actual ancestor of early sharks.}}
    5 KB (695 words) - 17:29, 15 April 2017
  • '''Response to [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part1a.html#amph1 Transition from primitive bony fish to amphibians]''' .... Had paired fins with a leg-like arrangement of major limb bones, capable of flexing at the "elbow", and had an early-amphibian-like skull and teeth.
    15 KB (2,207 words) - 00:55, 2 September 2014
  • ...ion and dating of the strata where the fossils were found, and whether the fossils belonged to the same species. ...a or East Asia. Prior to any physical evidence, he commissioned a painting of his hypothetical [[missing link]], which he named ''Pithecanthropus alalus'
    11 KB (1,776 words) - 01:30, 15 January 2016
  • '''Response to [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part2c.html#arti Artiodactyls (cloven-hoofed animals)]''' ...al Asia. Perhaps the new Asian expeditions will find Paleocene artiodactyl fossils too. At any rate, somewhere between Chriacus & Diacodexis, the hind leg cha
    16 KB (2,384 words) - 23:56, 8 August 2014
  • '''Response to [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part2b.html#ceta Cetaceans (whales, dolphins)]''' ...ating tendencies), blunt crushing cheek teeth, and flattened claws instead of nails.
    17 KB (2,594 words) - 19:02, 30 May 2025
  • '''{{PAGENAME}}''' is used to list older newsworthy items related to [[Evolutionism]] (the belief in evolution ...computer science professor quits believing Darwin’s theories] ‘The origin of species is exactly what Darwin cannot explain’ states Gelernter. ''The Co
    20 KB (2,673 words) - 23:27, 14 December 2024
  • ...ids were either fully ape or fully human. The two primary taxonomic genera of ape-men clearly delineate this distinction. With rare exception the taxonom ...ine]] summarizes the case of human evolution poignantly in the ''[[Journal of Creation]]'':
    35 KB (5,146 words) - 17:10, 30 December 2024
  • ...buttals to alleged creationist arguments against evolutionism. Much of the list was subsequently published in 2005 as ''The Counter-Creationism Handbook''. ...ct, but it is important that creationists respond to this anti-creationism list.
    49 KB (6,543 words) - 02:40, 9 August 2020
  • ...Bones of Contention|Bones of Contention: A Creationist Assessment of Human Fossils]]''. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1992. p. 336</ref>]] ...f the human lineage. As palaeontologist John de Vos of the National Museum of Natural History in Leiden puts it:
    47 KB (7,241 words) - 19:17, 1 December 2015
  • ...question]]s and others are irrelevant. The page displays a copyright date of 1992 and was presumably finalized sometime that year. ...this page is still intended to be a comprehensive source for the rebuttal of the article at Talk.Origins.
    30 KB (4,771 words) - 18:38, 9 April 2017
  • ...erican Book of Dinosaurs: The Best Minds in Paleontology Create a Portrait of the Prehistoric Era|location=New York|publisher=Byron Preiss Visual Public ...the time of the [[global flood]], which is described in the Biblical book of [[Genesis]]. Furthermore, because the text says that all land animals were
    30 KB (4,170 words) - 15:57, 31 October 2025
  • ...ut was not subject to a rigorous research program, because the historicity of [[Genesis]] was largely taken for granted. With the rise of [[secularization]] in the 19th century, however, creationism came under fir
    32 KB (4,891 words) - 16:01, 23 September 2024
  • [[File:Pillars_of_Creation7.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Pillars of Creation. Photo: NASA/Hubble Telescope.]] ...ngs out of nothing as described in the Bible and that therefore the theory of evolution is incorrect."<ref>Merriam-Webster (2019). "[http://www.merriam-w
    290 KB (42,044 words) - 18:12, 4 November 2025
  • "Urizen as the Creator of the Material World" from Europe, A Prophecy. 1794.]] ...d the extent to which natural processes were involved with the development of the [[cosmos]].
    295 KB (42,641 words) - 18:12, 4 November 2025