Talk:Nephilim: Difference between revisions

Talk:Nephilim (view source)

220 bytes removed , 28 May 2007

→‎Sons of God: Complaint about style of the current version of this section

67

edits

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 == Sons of God ==
-what does it mean that the [[sons of god]] was most obviusly the nephilm? couldn't they just have been a caste of angels? or some other thing?
+[[User:Grifken|Grifken]] 01:07, 28 May 2007 (EDT)
+It seems poor style to put the counter-argument for each of the three positions on the the Sons of God in this paragraph. It would make more sense to develop counter-arguments in the Controversy section. But whatever the boss wants goes, I guess...
-and the job references can support either especially scine job was written in poetic prose...
+Am I the only one who uses the comment section to discuss changes before making them?
+[[User:Grifken|Grifken]] 01:07, 28 May 2007 (EDT)
-also the spies reoprt on canna it mentions giants and then nephilim...they could be too diffrent things....
-and also alas the book of enoch and jublie...well lets see what eh council of trent had to say about them....
-another idea scine giants are in folk lore and some sugested that it was the mark of cain...could the nephilim be the elves and pikes and spirets of legends...or would those be "angels" too...?
-??
 == Other created men? ==