67
edits
Talk:Nephilim: Difference between revisions
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
Comment on Ashcraft's reversion and a suggested re-writing of this article
(Defense of the uniqueness of Adam and Eve as the sole human progenitors.) |
(Comment on Ashcraft's reversion and a suggested re-writing of this article) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk}} | {{talk}} | ||
== Recent Changes (May 27, 2007) == | |||
[[User:Grifken|Grifken]] 21:59, 27 May 2007 (EDT)<br /> | |||
This page could be much improved, and as such I have started working re-writing a lot of it, whilst presenting both of the main positions on the subject. I am not trying to delete "opposing" viewpoints. The statement that "angels are not biological beings" may reflect a widely held Platonic belief that angelic beings have no material component, but runs headlong into Genesis 18:6-8 which states that the angels ate the food Sarah prepared for them, and Psalm 78:25 which says the manna in the wilderness was the "bread of angels". Its position in the article was rather strongly POV, and I thought it did not belong there.<br /><br /> | |||
I propose to re-write this page to outline the two historical schools of thought in the church: the angel-human hybrid and the Line of Seth interbreeding with line of Cain. We can have a section under each school for their primary arguments, where the "angels are not biological beings" would be appropriate. | |||
<br /> | |||
[[User:Grifken|Grifken]] 21:59, 27 May 2007 (EDT) | |||
== Sons of God == | == Sons of God == | ||
