899
edits
Creationist (talk | contribs) |
Creationist (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
<blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;"> | <blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;"> | ||
...supporters of ‘jerky’ evolution ([[Saltationism|saltationism]] and its relative, [[ | ...supporters of ‘jerky’ evolution ([[Saltationism|saltationism]] and its relative, [[Punctuated equilibrium|punctuated equilibria]]) point out that the fossil record does not show gradualism, and that the hypothetical transitional forms would be disadvantageous. But supporters of gradual evolution point out that large, [[information]]-increasing changes are so improbable that one would need to invoke a secular miracle. Creationists agree with ''both'': punctuational evolution can’t happen, and gradual evolution can’t happen—in fact, particles-to-people evolution can’t happen at all!<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/scientific_american.asp</ref> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
edits