Creationism: Difference between revisions

From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 135: Line 135:


<blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;">
<blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;">
...supporters of ‘jerky’ evolution ([[Saltationism|saltationism]] and its relative, [[Theory of Punctuated Equilibrium|punctuated equilibria]]) point out that the fossil record does not show gradualism, and that the hypothetical transitional forms would be disadvantageous. But supporters of gradual evolution point out that large, [[information]]-increasing changes are so improbable that one would need to invoke a secular miracle. Creationists agree with ''both'': punctuational evolution can’t happen, and gradual evolution can’t happen—in fact, particles-to-people evolution can’t happen at all!<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/scientific_american.asp</ref>
...supporters of ‘jerky’ evolution ([[Saltationism|saltationism]] and its relative, [[Punctuated equilibrium|punctuated equilibria]]) point out that the fossil record does not show gradualism, and that the hypothetical transitional forms would be disadvantageous. But supporters of gradual evolution point out that large, [[information]]-increasing changes are so improbable that one would need to invoke a secular miracle. Creationists agree with ''both'': punctuational evolution can’t happen, and gradual evolution can’t happen—in fact, particles-to-people evolution can’t happen at all!<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/scientific_american.asp</ref>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


899

edits

Navigation menu