Check users, creationist, Administrators
22,649
edits
Cosmological argument: Difference between revisions
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
→Versions
m (→Leibnizian) |
m (→Versions) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Versions== | ==Versions== | ||
Certain versions of the argument attempt to show the [[universe]] as having a beginning like the kalam cosmological argument. It does not assume that there was a beginning however but demonstrates the premise by appealing to both a philosophic method and scientific methodologies. Scientific evidence like the [[big bang theory]] or philosophical arguments like reasons why an actual infinite cannot exist are used to defend particular premises. However outside of the kalam cosmological argument, the [[history]] predominately does not rely on a beginning of the universe. The Leibnizian cosmological helps express the proper language | Certain versions of the argument attempt to show the [[universe]] as having a beginning like the kalam cosmological argument. It does not assume that there was a beginning however but demonstrates the premise by appealing to both a philosophic method and scientific methodologies. Scientific evidence like the [[big bang theory]] or philosophical arguments like reasons why an actual infinite cannot exist are used to defend particular premises. However outside of the kalam cosmological argument, the [[history]] predominately does not rely on a beginning of the universe. The Leibnizian cosmological argument helps express the argument through introducing proper language. | ||
There are premises that help sketch out a general pattern of approach for the cosmological argument. It takes into account both medieval and more modern formulations. As follows is the general premises; | There are premises that help sketch out a general pattern of approach for the cosmological argument. It takes into account both medieval and more modern formulations. As follows is the general premises; | ||
