Check users, creationist, Administrators
22,649
edits
Cosmological argument: Difference between revisions
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
→Kalam
(→Kalam) |
m (→Kalam) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
The kalam cosmological argument is a version of the cosmological argument finding it s origin within medieval [[Islamic]] [[philosophy]] of [[religion]]. Kalam is different to the more general cosmological argument when the history of its development is analyzed. This is because kalam contends for a first or beginning cause of the universe. The cosmological argument merely argues for there to be a necessary cause that endures contingent things in existence at all times. There isn't a requirement for a beginning of the universe with the latter. | The kalam cosmological argument is a version of the cosmological argument finding it s origin within medieval [[Islamic]] [[philosophy]] of [[religion]]. Kalam is different to the more general cosmological argument when the history of its development is analyzed. This is because kalam contends for a first or beginning cause of the universe. The cosmological argument merely argues for there to be a necessary cause that endures contingent things in existence at all times. There isn't a requirement for a beginning of the universe with the latter. | ||
Although first posited by al-Ghazili within Islam, [[Christian]] philosophy, through the work of William Lane Craig has continued the legacy. William Lane Craig, a world-renowned philosopher is the most prominent defender of the kalam cosmological argument in the public sphere. From his contemporary work is where the argument is presented. The kalam cosmological argument contains two premises and a conclusion. It is from the premises | Although first posited by al-Ghazili within Islam, [[Christian]] philosophy, through the work of William Lane Craig has continued the legacy. William Lane Craig, a world-renowned philosopher is the most prominent defender of the kalam cosmological argument in the public sphere. From his contemporary work is where the argument is presented. The kalam cosmological argument contains two premises and a conclusion. It is from the premises that the conclusion follows necessarily. The crucial premise of which seems to spawn the most public debate and discourse is premise 2. Premise 2 states that the universe began to exist. There must be some type of cause whether transcendent (supernatural) or natural. There are defeaters for a natural cause of the universe. Therefore the cause of the universe coheres with and is best explained by [[theism]] rather than [[atheism]]. | ||
The kalam cosmological argument is; | The kalam cosmological argument is; | ||
