Check users, creationist, Administrators
22,649
edits
Cosmological argument: Difference between revisions
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
→BGV theorem
m (→Premise 2) |
m (→BGV theorem) |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:''Main Article: [[Borde-Guth-Vilenkin singularity theorem]]'' | :''Main Article: [[Borde-Guth-Vilenkin singularity theorem]]'' | ||
The Borde-Guth-Vilenkin singularity theorem (or BGV theorem) was developed in 2003 by three leading cosmologists; Arvind Borde, Alan Guth and Alex Vilenkin. Subsequently in recent years since, the BGV theorem has become widely respected and accepted within the [[physics]] community.<ref name="wlcnt">William Lane Craig and J. P. Moreland, ''The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology'' (Blackwell Publishing 2009), pg. 142</ref> According to ''Inflationary spacetimes are not past-complete'', the 2003 paper outlining the BGV theorem a space-time boundary is highlighted at the inflation event. The chief finding though was that inflation alone is not enough to explain the universe, there needs to be a whole new physics to explain "correct conditions at the boundary".<ref> | The Borde-Guth-Vilenkin singularity theorem (or BGV theorem) was developed in 2003 by three leading cosmologists; Arvind Borde, Alan Guth and Alex Vilenkin. Subsequently in recent years since, the BGV theorem has become widely respected and accepted within the [[physics]] community.<ref name="wlcnt">William Lane Craig and J. P. Moreland, ''The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology'' (Blackwell Publishing 2009), pg. 142</ref> According to ''Inflationary spacetimes are not past-complete'', the 2003 paper outlining the BGV theorem, a space-time boundary is highlighted at the [[inflation]] event. The chief finding though was that inflation alone is not enough to explain the universe, there needs to be a whole new physics to explain "correct conditions at the boundary".<ref name="2003paper">A. Borde, A. Guth and A. Vilenkin, ''Inflationary space-times are not past-complete'', Phys. | ||
Rev. Lett. 90 151301 (2003), pg. 4[http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0110012]</ref> | |||
It is by this groundbreaking and widely respected scientific theorem that demonstrates the beginning of the universe, or premise 2 of the kalam cosmological argument. | It is by this groundbreaking and widely respected scientific theorem that demonstrates the beginning of the universe, or premise 2 of the kalam cosmological argument. | ||
