110,311
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== Problems == | == Problems == | ||
There are several problems with the assignment of ‘’Homo erectus’’ as an evolutionary transitional form to ‘’Homo sapiens’’ and Neanderthals. | There are several problems with the assignment of ‘’Homo erectus’’ as an evolutionary transitional form to ‘’Homo sapiens’’ and Neanderthals. | ||
=== Morphological distinction === | === Morphological distinction === | ||
<ref name=woodmorappe>[http://creation.com/how-different-is-the-cranial-vault-thickness-of-homo-erectus-from-modern-man How different is the cranial-vault thickness of Homo erectus from modern man?] by John Woodmorappe, Journal of Creation 14(1):10–13, April 2000. | |||
{{cquote|My own conclusion is that ''Homo erectus'' and Neandertal are actually the same: ''Homo erectus'' is the lower end, with regard to size, of a continuum that includes ''Homo erectus'', early ''Homo sapiens'', and Neandertal. The range of cranial capacities for fossil humans is in line with the range of cranial capacities for modern humans. Modern humans have a cranial capacity from about 700 cc all the way up to 2200 cc.<ref>Lubenow p. 127</ref>}} | |||
=== Appropriate timeframe === | === Appropriate timeframe === |