Check users, creationist, Administrators
22,649
edits
Cosmological argument: Difference between revisions
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
→Premise 1
m (→Premise 1) |
m (→Premise 1) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Premise is a type of first fundamental law of [[metaphysics]] basically stating that things do not pop into existence from non-being, being only comes from being. This fundamental to metaphysics parallels [[biogenesis]] which is a [[scientific law]] of [[Biology]]. Any other avenue for the premise would be trying to prove something far less obvious instead of supporting the obvious. It is human common sense that being comes from established being. It is a premise that relies on the common experience of humans. Some atheists will actually argue against premise 1 by stating, the universe did pop into being out of non-existence. This is a fail safe last resort point they attempt to get across but rely on complete fabrication and irrational beliefs. It is considered by defenders of the argument when critics question premise 1, that the argument has been won. The appeal for existence from non-existence by atheists and naturalists is actually an appeal to a type of [[miracle]]. | Premise is a type of first fundamental law of [[metaphysics]] basically stating that things do not pop into existence from non-being, being only comes from being. This fundamental to metaphysics parallels [[biogenesis]] which is a [[scientific law]] of [[Biology]]. Any other avenue for the premise would be trying to prove something far less obvious instead of supporting the obvious. It is human common sense that being comes from established being. It is a premise that relies on the common experience of humans. Some atheists will actually argue against premise 1 by stating, the universe did pop into being out of non-existence. This is a fail safe last resort point they attempt to get across but rely on complete fabrication and irrational beliefs. It is considered by defenders of the argument when critics question premise 1, that the argument has been won. The appeal for existence from non-existence by atheists and naturalists is actually an appeal to a type of [[miracle]]. | ||
A very important distinction is that premise 1 is not a physical principle but a metaphysical principle. It only addresses the whole of the universe not the parts within the universe. The [[scientific method]] is a way to explore natural events within the cosmos, but metaphysics concerns being for beings sake grappling why there exists a nature to begin with. | A very important distinction is that premise 1 is not a physical principle but a metaphysical principle. It only addresses the whole of the universe not the parts within the universe. The [[scientific method]] is a way to explore natural events within the cosmos, but metaphysics (and by extension philosophy) concerns being for beings sake grappling why there exists a nature to begin with. | ||
=====Quantum physics===== | =====Quantum physics===== | ||
