Check users, creationist, Administrators
22,649
edits
Chromosome: Difference between revisions
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
→Chromosome Fusion
| Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
Evolutionists have concluded, through the mapping of the genome, that a type of chromosome fusion from ape-like ancestors into humans happened roughly 2 million years ago. This is determined to be irrefutable proof to some as clear-cut evidence of common ancestry evolution.<ref>[http://www.ias.ac.in/jgenet/Vol77No1/41.pdf Origin of Human Chromosome 2 Revisited]</ref><ref>[http://www.evolutionpages.com/chromosome_2.htm Human Chromosome 2 is a fusion of two ancestral chromosomes] By Alec MacAndrew</ref> Creationists would agree that indeed a chromosomal fusion event did indeed create human chromosome #2. It is because the [[chimp]] [[specie]] has two fewer chromosomes then a human evolutionists consider this scientific finding a strong piece of evidence to vindicate their philosophical view on the [[origin of life]], or [[common ancestry]]. | Evolutionists have concluded, through the mapping of the genome, that a type of chromosome fusion from ape-like ancestors into humans happened roughly 2 million years ago. This is determined to be irrefutable proof to some as clear-cut evidence of common ancestry evolution.<ref>[http://www.ias.ac.in/jgenet/Vol77No1/41.pdf Origin of Human Chromosome 2 Revisited]</ref><ref>[http://www.evolutionpages.com/chromosome_2.htm Human Chromosome 2 is a fusion of two ancestral chromosomes] By Alec MacAndrew</ref> Creationists would agree that indeed a chromosomal fusion event did indeed create human chromosome #2. It is because the [[chimp]] [[specie]] has two fewer chromosomes then a human evolutionists consider this scientific finding a strong piece of evidence to vindicate their philosophical view on the [[origin of life]], or [[common ancestry]]. | ||
The common Darwinian assumptions align with those used to argue that [[pseudogenes]] and generally [[junk DNA]] are proofs. Pseudogenes emerge within similar loci of apes and humans, or what are called | The common Darwinian assumptions align with those used to argue that [[pseudogenes]] and generally [[junk DNA]] are proofs. Pseudogenes emerge within similar loci of apes and humans, or what are called parallel intron gains and are considered evidence of common ancestry. | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
