Check users, creationist, Administrators
17,631
edits
(Cleanup and new French link) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Bible.jpg|thumb|300px|A Latin [[Bible]] handwritten in 1407 AD.]] | [[Image:Bible.jpg|thumb|300px|A Latin [[Bible]] handwritten in 1407 AD.]] | ||
'''Hermeneutics''' is the [[science]] or practice of understanding text (''theory of interpretation''). Although there are secular applications, the term was used originally | '''Hermeneutics''' is the [[science]] or practice of understanding text (''theory of interpretation''). Although there are secular applications, the term was used originally to stand for the field of Biblical interpretation. The [[philosophy]] or methodology assumes the [[Bible]] remains as written, but that its interpretation changes between historical periods, across cultures, etc. It is a qualitative research tradition that uses these diverse experiences of people as a tool for understanding the social, cultural, political, and historical context in which interpretations occurs. | ||
The Oxford Companion to the Bible defines hermeneutics as “''inquires into the conditions under which the interpretation of biblical texts may be judged possible, faithful, accurate, responsible, or productive in relation to some specified goal''.” | The Oxford Companion to the Bible defines hermeneutics as “''inquires into the conditions under which the interpretation of biblical texts may be judged possible, faithful, accurate, responsible, or productive in relation to some specified goal''.” | ||
It deals with issues, such as whether the [[Bible]] should be viewed as history or [[mythological]]. It may include the process of [[exegesis]] but is broader in scope as it entails a study of biblical texts in order to understand not only the historical aspects of the writings but also the significance of these documents for the present | It deals with issues, such as whether the [[Bible]] should be viewed as history or [[mythological]]. It may include the process of [[exegesis]] but is broader in scope as it entails a study of biblical texts in order to understand not only the historical aspects of the writings but also the significance of these documents for the present. | ||
== Methods == | == Methods == | ||
=== Exegesis === | === Exegesis === | ||
: ''Main Article [[Exegesis]]'' | : ''Main Article: [[Exegesis]]'' | ||
Exegesis (also known as the Historical-grammatical method) is a critical interpretation of any text, especially of religious texts such as the [[Bible]] or [[Qur'an]]. More specifically it is an extensive investigation of the original meaning of a text in its historical and literary contexts. A person | Exegesis (also known as the Historical-grammatical method) is a critical interpretation of any text, especially of religious texts such as the [[Bible]] or [[Qur'an]]. More specifically it is an extensive investigation of the original meaning of a text in its historical and literary contexts. A person skilled in the science of exegesis is known as an exegete. The opposite of this would be [[eisegesis]]. | ||
An important principle of exegesis is determining the meaning an author wished to convey to the audience. It is quite right to use the | An important principle of exegesis is determining the meaning an author wished to convey to the audience. It is quite right to use the historian's principle of giving more historical weight to those who have more historical immediacy in order to determine the original intention of the author. It is notable that the [[young earth|young age view]] was held by the early church as well as early Jewish religious leaders. | ||
=== Eisegesis === | === Eisegesis === | ||
: ''Main Article [[Eisegesis]]'' | : ''Main Article: [[Eisegesis]]'' | ||
Eisegesis means "reading in" and refers to the practice of reading your own ideas into the text. It is an error, in that it does not allow the Bible to speak to you on its own terms, but only through the filter of your preconceived ideas and even worldview. Platonist philosophy may have influenced people to adopt the practice of allegorical interpretation and abandon | Eisegesis means "reading in" and refers to the practice of reading your own ideas into the text. It is an error, in that it does not allow the Bible to speak to you on its own terms, but only through the filter of your preconceived ideas and even worldview. Platonist philosophy may have influenced people to adopt the practice of allegorical interpretation and abandon the more historical/grammatical approach of [[exegesis]]. | ||
== Historical vs. Mythological == | == Historical vs. Mythological == | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
!width="180"| '''Mythology''' | !width="180"| '''Mythology''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Recounting of events in dry, factual, linear manner | |Recounting of events in dry, factual, linear manner | ||
|Exaggeration, hyperbole, and emotional appeals | |Exaggeration, hyperbole, and emotional appeals | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
=== Time frames === | === Time frames === | ||
[[Genesis]] provides specific dates and time frames for the major events, particularly those related to [[the flood]]. For example: | [[Genesis]] provides specific dates and time frames for the major events, particularly those related to [[the flood]]. For example: | ||
{{bible quote|13Now it came about in the six hundred and first year, in the first month, on the first of the month, the water was dried up from the earth. Then Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and behold, the surface of the ground was dried up. 14In the second month, on the twenty-seventh day of the month, the earth was dry. |book=Genesis|chap=8|verses= | {{bible quote|13Now it came about in the six hundred and first year, in the first month, on the first of the month, the water was dried up from the earth. Then Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and behold, the surface of the ground was dried up. 14In the second month, on the twenty-seventh day of the month, the earth was dry. |book=Genesis|chap=8|verses=13-14}} | ||
On the other hand, the author is unaware of a single [[mythological]] account from another ancient culture which records its events in such a detailed time frame. | On the other hand, the author is unaware of a single [[mythological]] account from another ancient culture which records its events in such a detailed time frame. | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
{{bible quote|10Now a river flowed out of Eden to water the garden; and from there it divided and became four rivers. 11The name of the first is Pishon; it flows around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold. 12The gold of that land is good; the bdellium and the onyx stone are there. 13The name of the second river is Gihon; it flows around the whole land of Cush. 14The name of the third river is Tigris; it flows east of Assyria And the fourth river is the Euphrates. |book=Genesis|chap=2|verses=10-14}} | {{bible quote|10Now a river flowed out of Eden to water the garden; and from there it divided and became four rivers. 11The name of the first is Pishon; it flows around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold. 12The gold of that land is good; the bdellium and the onyx stone are there. 13The name of the second river is Gihon; it flows around the whole land of Cush. 14The name of the third river is Tigris; it flows east of Assyria And the fourth river is the Euphrates. |book=Genesis|chap=2|verses=10-14}} | ||
Some other ancient historical and [[mythological]] accounts do indeed provide rudimentary genealogies and basic geography. However, none do it in such striking detail, with such objective style. The description of Eden reads like a dry geography text, not a | Some other ancient historical and [[mythological]] accounts do indeed provide rudimentary genealogies and basic geography. However, none do it in such striking detail, with such objective style. The description of Eden reads like a dry geography text, not a mass-market novel. | ||
=== Objective description of characters === | === Objective description of characters === | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
* [[Moses]] was chosen to lead his people from Egypt, but was also meek, shy, and had a bad temper which ultimately kept him out of the promised land; | * [[Moses]] was chosen to lead his people from Egypt, but was also meek, shy, and had a bad temper which ultimately kept him out of the promised land; | ||
* [[David]] was a "Man after God's own heart," an adulterer, and a murderer; | * [[David]] was a "Man after God's own heart," an adulterer, and a murderer; | ||
* [[Solomon]] was the wisest man of his day, but married pagan wives and allowed them to set up temples opposed to God | * [[Solomon]] was the wisest man of his day, but married pagan wives and allowed them to set up temples opposed to God. | ||
The objective style in which these men are described is inconsistent with hero-myths. Hero-myths build up characters into such flawless beings that they become flat and unbelievable to the modern mind. The [[Bible]], on the other hand, describes its characters in such rich detail, both good and bad, that the characters strike us as ''real''. | The objective style in which these men are described is inconsistent with hero-myths. Hero-myths build up characters into such flawless beings that they become flat and unbelievable to the modern mind. The [[Bible]], on the other hand, describes its characters in such rich detail, both good and bad, that the characters strike us as ''real''. | ||
=== Earliest known form === | === Earliest known form === | ||
The earliest known form of [[Genesis]] is written. There is no evidence that it arose from oral traditions. Some academics ''assume'' that there was one, but they do this without evidence to support their claim. Genesis has been held out as being based on documents written by [[Moses]] himself. Other apocryphal accounts like the [[Book of Jubilees]] which are totally factually consistent with Genesis (and stop before Moses's death, unlike Genesis) explicitly claim to have been written by Moses | The earliest known form of [[Genesis]] is written. There is no evidence that it arose from oral traditions. Some academics ''assume'' that there was one, but they do this without evidence to support their claim. Genesis has been held out as being based on documents written by [[Moses]] himself. Other apocryphal accounts like the [[Book of Jubilees]] which are totally factually consistent with Genesis (and stop before Moses's death, unlike Genesis) explicitly claim to have been written by Moses. | ||
This contrasts sharply with [[Greek]] [[mythology]], which was collected from oral traditions by Greek historians and mythographers like Herodotus seeking to record their country's beliefs, as well as poets and dramatists whose manifest purpose was to entertain and inspire, rather than to provide historical annals. | |||
{{Bible navbox}} | {{Bible navbox}} | ||
Line 76: | Line 74: | ||
[[Category:History]] | [[Category:History]] | ||
[[Category:Mythology]] | [[Category:Mythology]] | ||
[[fr:Herméneutique]] |