Pisco formation: Difference between revisions

From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==The site== ===Interpretation of data=== ===state of fossil preservation=== ==Implications== ===Mixed environment=== ==References== Brand, L. R., R. Esperante, A. V. Chadwick, O. Poma, an...)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
==Implications==
==Implications==
===Mixed environment===
===Mixed environment===
===The chalk "problem"==
==References==
==References==
Brand, L. R., R. Esperante, A. V. Chadwick, O. Poma, and M. Alomia. 2004. Fossil whale preservation implies high diatom accumulation rate in the Miocene-Pliocene Pisco Formation of Peru. Geology, 32:165-168.
Brand, L. R., R. Esperante, A. V. Chadwick, O. Poma, and M. Alomia. 2004. Fossil whale preservation implies high diatom accumulation rate in the Miocene-Pliocene Pisco Formation of Peru. Geology, 32:165-168.
1,127

edits

Navigation menu