67
edits
m (→Sons of God: no) |
(Deleted my posts) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[User:Grifken|Grifken]] 01:07, 28 May 2007 (EDT) | [[User:Grifken|Grifken]] 01:07, 28 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
It seems poor style to put the counter-argument for each of the three positions on the the Sons of God in this paragraph. It would make more sense to develop counter-arguments in the Controversy section | It seems poor style to put the counter-argument for each of the three positions on the the Sons of God in this paragraph. It would make more sense to develop counter-arguments in the Controversy section. | ||
Am I the only one who uses the comment section to discuss changes before making them? | Am I the only one who uses the comment section to discuss changes before making them? | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
I agree with you, Oel. I am of the opinion that it is either a social label (that may describe mighty men, or kings), or it may refer to some genetic variation of humans; i.e. Neanderthals (but then there is the question of how they survived the flood). | I agree with you, Oel. I am of the opinion that it is either a social label (that may describe mighty men, or kings), or it may refer to some genetic variation of humans; i.e. Neanderthals (but then there is the question of how they survived the flood). | ||
--[[User:Leetsoga|Soga]] 11:29, 3 December 2006 (EST) | --[[User:Leetsoga|Soga]] 11:29, 3 December 2006 (EST) | ||
edits