Opinion:A theory against (certain aspects) of evolution and abiogenesis

The fact that abiogenesis is never observed to occur in nature strongly suggests that it never occurred (ie: through unguided naturalistic processes). This statement is completely falsifiable. While this doesn't absolutely prove that abiogenesis never occurred (through unguided naturalistic processes) science doesn't deal with absolute proof.

The fact that single celled organisms are never observed to evolve (ie: through darwinian processes like RM + NS) into multi - celled organisms (ones that have as many atoms and IC systems as an insect) is strong evidence that they never have. This statement is completely falsifiable. While this doesn't absolutely prove insects never evolved from single celled organisms, science doesn't deal with absolute proof. Speculating that it takes millions of years is unfalsifiable and hence unscientific.

The fact that wings are never observed to evolve (ie: through RM + NS) from organisms that don't have wings strongly suggests they never have. While this doesn't absolutely prove wings never evolved through darwinian processes, science doesn't deal with absolute proof. Speculating that it takes millions of years is unfalsifiable and hence unscientific.

The theory that abiogenesis never occurred in nature (through unguided naturalistic processes) makes a testable prediction. It predicts that we should never observe abiogenesis occur in nature.

The theory that single celled organisms never evolved (through RM + NS) into insects in nature makes a prediction. It predicts that we should never observe single celled organisms in nature evolve into insects (or organisms that have as many atoms and IC structures as insects).

The theory that wings never evolved (through RM + NS) in nature makes a testable prediction. It predicts that we should never observe wings evolve in nature (through RM + NS). It's testable, it's falsifiable, it's science.