CreationWiki talk:Quotes
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
The quote box apparently does not function with links included? Any clues? Including references is a standard part of quoting.
place quote here
The National Pro-Life Alliance is currently asking US citizens to sign a petition urging lawmakers to cosponsor the Life at Conception Act in both the Senate and House of Representatives.
The National Pro-Life Alliance is currently asking US citizens to sign a petition urging lawmakers to cosponsor the Life at Conception Act in both the Senate and House of Representatives.
The National Pro-Life Alliance is currently asking US citizens to [1] urging lawmakers to cosponsor the Life at Conception Act in both the Senate and House of Representatives.
E. Either you live by faith or you are a rational thinker.test link [1] [2]
- ↑ test simple reference
- ↑ "test cite web". http://www.creationwiki.org. Retrieved June 25, 2012.
My clue is: We must include the "www." before the url address. Luiz Alexandre Silva 12:47, 24 June 2012 (PDT)
Second try
- No - I added the www to the above links and still no go....--Ashcraft - (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2012 (PDT)
- You are right. I see that the problem is with aspx codes. See below:
testing without calling aspx www.nationalprolifealliance.com
testing calling aspx but using cite web template "sign a petition". http://www.nationalprolifealliance.com/npla_hlacpetition.aspx?pid=1115.
If you use the cite web template it will work well. hugs, Luiz Alexandre Silva 15:00, 24 June 2012 (PDT)
Here's another that does not work
| “ | A pregnant single woman (Roe) brought a class action challenging the constitutionality of the Texas criminal abortion laws, which proscribe procuring or attempting an abortion except on medical advice for the purpose of saving the mother's life. A licensed physician (Hallford), who had two state abortion prosecutions pending against him, was permitted to intervene. A childless married couple (the Does), the wife not being pregnant, separately attacked the laws, basing alleged injury on the future possibilities of contraceptive failure, pregnancy, unpreparedness for parenthood, and impairment of the wife's health. A three-judge District Court, which consolidated the actions, held that Roe and Hallford, and members of their classes, had standing to sue and presented justiciable controversies. Ruling that declaratory, though not injunctive, relief was warranted, the court declared the abortion statutes void as vague and overbroadly infringing those plaintiffs' Ninth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The court ruled the Does' complaint not justiciable. Appellants directly appealed to this Court on the injunctive rulings, and appellee cross-appealed from the District Court's grant of declaratory relief to Roe and Hallford. (Read the remainder of the decision) | ” |
But this one does:
| “ | "Given this account of creationism, am I a creationist? No. I do not regard Genesis as a scientific text. I have no vested theological interest in the age of the earth or the universe. I find the arguments of geologists persuasive when they argue for an earth that is 4.5 billion years old. What’s more, I find the arguments of astrophysicists persuasive when they argue for a universe that is approximately 14 billion years old. I believe they got it right. Even so, I refuse to be dogmatic here. I’m willing to listen to arguments to the contrary. Yet to date I’ve found none of the arguments for a young earth or a young universe convincing. Nature, as far as I’m concerned, has an integrity that enables it to be understood without recourse to revelatory texts. That said, I believe that nature points beyond itself to a transcendent reality, and that that reality is simultaneously reflected in a different idiom by the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments." Intelligent Design Coming Clean: William A. Dembski | ” |
Here's another that does not work but works if you use the 'cite web' template
| “ | A pregnant single woman (Roe) brought a class action challenging the constitutionality of the Texas criminal abortion laws, which proscribe procuring or attempting an abortion except on medical advice for the purpose of saving the mother's life. A licensed physician (Hallford), who had two state abortion prosecutions pending against him, was permitted to intervene. A childless married couple (the Does), the wife not being pregnant, separately attacked the laws, basing alleged injury on the future possibilities of contraceptive failure, pregnancy, unpreparedness for parenthood, and impairment of the wife's health. A three-judge District Court, which consolidated the actions, held that Roe and Hallford, and members of their classes, had standing to sue and presented justiciable controversies. Ruling that declaratory, though not injunctive, relief was warranted, the court declared the abortion statutes void as vague and overbroadly infringing those plaintiffs' Ninth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The court ruled the Does' complaint not justiciable. Appellants directly appealed to this Court on the injunctive rulings, and appellee cross-appealed from the District Court's grant of declaratory relief to Roe and Hallford. ("Read the remainder of the decision". http://supcourt.ntis.gov/get_case.html?casename=Case%20Name:%20ROE%20V.%20WADE,%20410%20U.S.%20113%20&searchstring=mode=casename&cn_words1=Roe&cn_words2=Wade.) | ” |
subscription?
| “ | testing something odd (is this text normal?) | ” |
| “ | The new research by famed paleontologist Meave Leakey in Kenya shows our family tree is more like a wayward bush with stubby branches, calling into question the evolution of our ancestors. The old theory was that the first and oldest species in our family tree, Homo habilis, evolved into Homo erectus, which then became us, Homo sapiens. But those two earlier species lived side-by-side about 1.5 million years ago in parts of Kenya for at least half a million years, Leakey and colleagues report in a paper published in Thursday’s issue of the journal Nature... Overall what it paints for human evolution is a 'chaotic kind of looking evolutionary tree rather than this heroic march that you see with the cartoons of an early ancestor evolving into some intermediate and eventually unto us,' Spoor said in a phone interview from a field office of the Koobi Fora Research Project in northern Kenya. (MSNBC 2007)[1] | ” |
| “ | (MSNBC 2007)[2] | ” |
| “ | (MSNBC 2007) | ” |
- ↑ Borenstein, Seth (2007, August 8).Fossils Paint Messy Picture of Human Origins. Associated Press.
- ↑ Borenstein, Seth (2007, August 8).Fossils Paint Messy Picture of Human Origins. Associated Press.
