creationist
4,563
edits
| Line 4,700: | Line 4,700: | ||
* - ('''http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jyotish''') | * - ('''http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jyotish''') | ||
* - The gospel of Matthew identifies these men as being from | * - The gospel of Matthew identifies these men as being from "from the East." Although some (e.g., ...) has proposed the men could have came from the Yemen-Oman area which is techinally eastwards of the land of Israel, in my humble opinion it does not seem likely, as same gospel writer (Matthew) describes the Queen of Sheba (Yemen-Oman area) as the "Queen of the South" in '''Matthew 12:42'''. | ||
"from the East." Although some (e.g., ...) has proposed the men could have came from the Yemen-Oman area which is techinally eastwards of the land of Israel, in my humble opinion it does not seem likely, as same gospel writer (Matthew) describes the Queen of Sheba (Yemen-Oman area) as the "Queen of the South" in '''Matthew 12:42'''. | |||
* - The Delitzch Hebrew Gospels (1877-1889) Hebrew text: "(Malkath Taiman)" Vine of David rendered literally into English as: "Queen of Teiman" | * - The Delitzch Hebrew Gospels (1877-1889) Hebrew text: "(Malkath Taiman)" Vine of David rendered literally into English as: "Queen of Teiman" | ||
* - Therefore from a Hebraic perspective it seems evident that the Yemen-Omam area would have been more chacterized by it dominant Southward nature then it techinally being a bit east of the land of Israel. | * - Therefore from a Hebraic perspective it seems evident that the Yemen-Omam area would have been more chacterized by it dominant Southward nature then it techinally being a bit east of the land of Israel. It seems plausible the "magi" were possibly the connected with region known as Parthia. | ||
== '''Hebrew, An Antidiluvian Language?'''' == | == '''Hebrew, An Antidiluvian Language?'''' == | ||