User talk:Anaccuratesource: Difference between revisions

From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 918: Line 918:
* - We should remember where these estimates (guesses) originate in just that conjectural interpretations. The people behind such dates are basing information with a perceived model linked a believe in humans evolution.
* - We should remember where these estimates (guesses) originate in just that conjectural interpretations. The people behind such dates are basing information with a perceived model linked a believe in humans evolution.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


* - Would a logical person believe that a computer was a product of chance and not design? Now would a logical person now also believe the more complex human mind and human body as a whole are also products of chance (derived from the advance development of (''magic'') mold growing out of ocean or something, which also surprise surprise is another a product of "chance")? Hmmmmm.
* - Would a logical person believe that a computer was a product of chance and not design? Now would a logical person now also believe the more complex human mind and human body as a whole are also products of chance (derived from the advance development of (''magic'') mold growing out of ocean or something, which also surprise surprise is another a product of "chance")? Hmmmmm.


* - Evolution teaches: non-living matter transformed into a cell (living matter) which reproduced (according to information from an advanced code known as DNA derived by chance) and harmoniously developed an advanced set of organs which work together with each other and to usually to a corresponding gender co-relation (males and females) all by itself. Does this sound logical?
* - '''Evolution teaches:''' non-living matter transformed into a cell (living matter), which reproduced (according to information from an advanced code known as DNA derived by chance), and harmoniously developed an advanced set of organs, which work together with each other; usually to a corresponding gender co-relation (males and females); all by itself. Now does this sound logical?


* - The Bible gets the titles, names and people right. For example the 2004 movie called: "The Prince and me" follows a fictional story which takes place in Modern Denmark. The movie puts a king named Haraald on the throne instead of a queen named Margrethe II. The Bible however always used the correct names and terms.
* - The Bible gets the titles, names and people right. For example: the 2004 movie called: "The Prince and me" follows a fictional story which takes place in Modern Denmark. The movie puts a king named Haraald on the throne instead of a queen named Margrethe II. The Bible however always used the correct names and terms.




-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* - '''Genealogy was a big deal to ancient Israelites:'''
* - '''Genealogy was a big deal to ancient Israelites:'''


* - Much of the information is taken from the Watchtower, July 1, 2012 page 26 and the Insight on the scriptures, under genealogy.
* - Much of the information is taken from the Watchtower, July 1, 2012 page 26 and the Insight on the scriptures, under genealogy.


* - 1.) Establishing tribal relationships. - '''Numbers 36:7-9; Joshua 19:51'''.
* - 1.) Establishing tribal relationships. - '''Numbers 36:7-9; Joshua 19:51'''.
Line 966: Line 970:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


* - The Bible does not Genesis and the book of Exodus are myths (or "allegory"). - '''John 17:17; 1 Timothy 4:7; 6:20; 2 Timothy 4:4; Titus 1:14; 2 Peter 1:16'''
* - The Bible does not internally view the books Genesis and Exodus as myths (or "allegory"). - '''John 17:17; 1 Timothy 4:7; 6:20; 2 Timothy 4:4; Titus 1:14; 2 Peter 1:16'''


== '''Adam & Eve''' ==
== '''Adam & Eve''' ==
creationist
4,563

edits

Navigation menu