Check users, creationist, Administrators
1,520
edits
No edit summary |
m (→Interpretation: sp) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Interpretation=== | ===Interpretation=== | ||
Since there are signs of sharks eating away at the whale corpse, there is clear evidence that the whale were not merely deposited in preexisting diatomite. The diatomite was formed at the same time whales died. Brand et al conclude, after debunking other interpretations, that the formation is a result of a massive [[diatom]] | Since there are signs of sharks eating away at the whale corpse, there is clear evidence that the whale were not merely deposited in preexisting diatomite. The diatomite was formed at the same time whales died. Brand et al conclude, after debunking other interpretations, that the formation is a result of a massive [[diatom]] bloom.There is some evidence of [[volcanism]] and this would supply to essential [[nutrient]] to produce a diatom bloom. This in turn killed the [[whales]] because blooms poison the [[water]]. | ||
===Implications=== | ===Implications=== | ||