1,127
edits
No edit summary |
(→Chalk "problem": added "the" to title of category) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Though the Flood would produce a general pattern in the fossil record ,due to [[fossil sorting]] (e.g. [[]hydrological sorting]] and ecological zonation), exceptions are bound to occur. Whales are not the only creatures found at the Pisco formation. The others strangely include a few [[sloths]] and some [[penguins]]. This is a clear example of creatures that live in completely different ecologies being buried at the same site. | Though the Flood would produce a general pattern in the fossil record ,due to [[fossil sorting]] (e.g. [[]hydrological sorting]] and ecological zonation), exceptions are bound to occur. Whales are not the only creatures found at the Pisco formation. The others strangely include a few [[sloths]] and some [[penguins]]. This is a clear example of creatures that live in completely different ecologies being buried at the same site. | ||
==Chalk "problem"== | ==The Chalk "problem"== | ||
Some anti-creationists assert that flood geology cannot account for chalk layers, but creationist point out that chalk formation is highly episodic. Snelling showed that massive blooms of foraminifera and coccolithophores could create site like the White Hills of Dover. [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1765/] | Some anti-creationists assert that flood geology cannot account for chalk layers, but creationist point out that chalk formation is highly episodic. Snelling showed that massive blooms of foraminifera and coccolithophores could create site like the White Hills of Dover. [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1765/] | ||
edits