Young universe evidence

From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science

Hubble Ultra Deep Field

Secular scientists place the age of the universe at approximately 13.7 billion years using standard cosmologies [1]. In contrast, the Bible specifically states that the Earth and universe were created over the course of a standard week, which occurred only 6000 years ago. Several pieces of evidence point to a young solar system and universe.

1 Supernova Remnants
2 Planet and Galaxy Formation
3 Quantized Redshift
4 Creation Cosmologies
5 Related References
6 See Also

Supernova Remnants

Main Article: Supernova Remnants

Danny Faulkner suggests that one major challenge to the standard model is the lack of old Supernova remnants. Theory suggests that supernovae should be visible for several million years, but yet we find almost none that are more than a few thousand years old.

Scientists propose [2] that the dating method Faulkner uses for SNRs only can be used for young ones, and claim that using a different dating method older SNR have been identified.

Exploding stars point to a young universe: Where are all the supernova remnants? by Jonathan Sarfati. Creation 19(3):46–48 June 1997
A Second Look at Supernova Remnants

Planet and Galaxy Formation

Some evolutionists assert that planetary and galaxy formation take millions of years. However, in 2004, the Spitzer Space Telescope detected a clearing of dust around a star that is "only" a million years old. They theorize that the object that cleared the dust is a planet at least as large as Jupiter. This would be (by evolutionary standards) the youngest planet ever observed. According to Alan Boss, an astronomer for the Carnegie Institution of Washington, the find "has profound implications for the prevalence of planetary systems similar to our own. That means you can make gas giant planets - a major component of our own solar system - in a short time scale, in even the shortest-lived disc." The discovery suggested scientists would have to rethink their models about planetary formation.^[1]

In 2002, scientists at the European Southern Observatory used an extremely powerful telescope and discovered what appeared to be fully formed galaxies. Considering the extreme distance (and the time it would take for visible light to travel that distance), scientists believe they are looking at an ancient view of the region and are surprised to find the galaxies already fully-formed. This, scientists say, was having "a profound impact on current attempts to understand the formation and evolution of galaxies."^[2]

Quantized Redshift

Main Article: Quantized Redshift

Creation Cosmologies

Main Article: Creation cosmology

Since the 13.7 billion year age of the universe is far beyond what a typical creation scientist would countenance. In response to these calculations several young universe creation cosmologies have been proposed.

C-decay

Main Article: C-decay

A continuously changing speed of light, which would explain both the age of the universe (and earth) due to radiometric dating, and also indicates that the doppler shift, the common method of dating far objects, is not caused by kinematic or relativistic red shift. This cosmology has the merit of explaining quantized red shift, which present cosmologies fail to do.

White Hole Cosmology

Main Article: White hole cosmology

A white hole near the earth at the beginning of the universe has been proposed to explain the existence of distant starlight in a young universe. This would cause, due to relativistic considerations, a change in apparent time. While this setup is acceptable to those assuming a creationist paradigm, it can be attacked on anthropocentric grounds by secular science. Russell Humphreys, the author of this cosmology, has been criticized by those upset by his model. A repository of criticism and his response can be found here.

Cosmic Center Model

Robert Gentry has also suggested a anthropocentric cosmology, based on a static universe with a shell of matter creating cavity energy in our region. His theory is sophisticated and appeals to gravitational and relativistic red shift caused by vacuum gravity repulsion. That theory is explicated in detail in several papers available at the Orion Foundation. Andrew Repp, a creationist, has posted a challenge to his cosmology in the Creation Society Research Quarterly. Gentry responds to this and other criticism in Big Bang Collapse and other reports found on his Published Reports Page. Brian Pitts has also criticized Gentry's model.