Titius-Bode Law

From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science

Jump to: navigation, search

The Titius-Bode Law states that the distances of the major satellites of the Sun follow a definite exponential pattern. It was, until the discovery of Neptune, held to be a valid predictor of the positions of the planets. Neptune is perhaps the only exception to this law among the eleven planetary and dwarf planetary bodies in the solar system, but that one exception has convinced mainstream astronomers to reject the law as invalid. But a small number of contrarian astronomers, including at least one creationist, now suggest that the law ought to stand after all.

Contents

The Formula

The classical formula for the Titius-Bode Law is:

D = \frac{A+4}{10}

where D is the semi-major axis measured in AU (that is, multiples of Earth's semi-major axis) and

A = 3\cdot2^{n-1}

where n = 1 for Venus, 2 for Earth, and so on. (In the special case of Mercury, A = 0.)

Predictive value

The actual values of peri- and aphelion, semi-major axis, and the Titius-Bode predicted semi-major axis for the eleven known planets and dwarf planets are shown below:
Name Perihelion Aphelion Semi-major axis Titius-Bode prediction Inclination Sidereal year
Mercury (planet) 460000000000.307 AU46,000,000 km
28,583,074.843 mi
700000000000.468 AU70,000,000 km
43,495,983.457 mi
579091750000.387 AU57,909,175 km
35,983,093.111 mi
598391480000.4 AU 0.122258045174187.005 °0.122 rad
7.783 grad
87.969340.241 a87.969 da
Venus 1074762590000.718 AU107,476,259 km
66,782,651.192 mi
1089421090000.728 AU108,942,109 km
67,693,488.154 mi
1082089300000.723 AU108,208,930 km
67,237,911.845 mi
1047185090000.7 AU 0.0592488666503773.395 °0.0592 rad
3.772 grad
224.700690.615 a224.701 da
Earth 1470900000000.983 AU147,090,000 km
91,397,488.666 mi
1521000000001.017 AU152,100,000 km
94,510,558.339 mi
149597886455.771 AU149,597,886.456 km
92,955,817.063 mi
1495978700001 AU 8.7266462599717E-075.0e-5 °8.72665e-7 rad
5.55556e-5 grad
365.2563661 a365.256 da
Mars 2066445450001.381 AU206,644,545 km
128,402,967.296 mi
2492287300001.666 AU249,228,730 km
154,863,553.1 mi
2279366370001.524 AU227,936,637 km
141,633,259.887 mi
2393565920001.6 AU 0.0323060444544151.851 °0.0323 rad
2.057 grad
686.961.881 a686.96 da
Ceres 3807265791502.545 AU380,726,579.15 km
236,572,528.403 mi
4468488376902.987 AU446,848,837.69 km
277,658,995.025 mi
413781189543.222.766 AU413,781,189.543 km
257,111,711.072 mi
4188740360002.8 AU 0.1847729813603910.587 °0.185 rad
11.763 grad
1679.784754.599 a1,679.785 da
Jupiter 7405200000004.95 AU740,520,000 km
460,137,795.276 mi
8166200000005.459 AU816,620,000 km
507,424,143.005 mi
7785700000005.204 AU778,570,000 km
483,780,969.14 mi
7779089240005.2 AU 0.0227765467385261.305 °0.0228 rad
1.45 grad
4330.58662511.857 a4,330.587 da
Saturn 13493727874009.02 AU1.34937e+9 km
838,461,377.679 mi
150345859350010.05 AU1.50346e+9 km
934,205,858.723 mi
14267148861909.537 AU1.42671e+9 km
886,519,529.815 mi
149597870000010 AU 0.0433539786195392.484 °0.0434 rad
2.76 grad
10759.534529.458 a10,759.534 da
Uranus 274130000000018.324 AU2.7413e+9 km
1.70336e+9 mi
300362000000020.078 AU3.00362e+9 km
1.86636e+9 mi
287246000000019.201 AU2.87246e+9 km
1.78486e+9 mi
293211825200019.6 AU 0.0129852496348380.744 °0.013 rad
0.827 grad
30681.6153001584.002 a30,681.615 da
Neptune 444445000000029.709 AU4.44445e+9 km
2.76165e+9 mi
454567000000030.386 AU4.54567e+9 km
2.82455e+9 mi
449506000000030.048 AU4.49506e+9 km
2.7931e+9 mi
580439735600038.8 AU 0.030874874467781.769 °0.0309 rad
1.966 grad
60189.5475164.79 a60,189.548 da
Pluto 4436824591966.429.658 AU4.43682e+9 km
2.75691e+9 mi
737592789763249.305 AU7.37593e+9 km
4.58319e+9 mi
5906376244799.239.482 AU5.90638e+9 km
3.67005e+9 mi
1154895556400077.2 AU 0.2991799770537417.142 °0.299 rad
19.046 grad
90614.8725248.09 a90,614.872 da
Eris 567424720910037.93 AU5.67425e+9 km
3.52581e+9 mi
1459028026110097.53 AU1.45903e+10 km
9.06598e+9 mi
1013256293084067.732 AU1.01326e+10 km
6.29608e+9 mi
23038071980000154 AU 0.7707286710344444.16 °0.771 rad
49.066 grad
203590.35557.4 a203,590.35 da


The semi-major axes of the first seven classical planets, and the dwarf planet Ceres, approximate the values that the Titius-Bode Law predicts very closely. Indeed the Titius-Bode Law aided directly in the discovery of Ceres. Furthermore, the discovery of Uranus was held to validate this law, because the formulation of this law, and its prediction of the semi-major axis of a planet beyond Saturn, anticipated the discovery of Uranus--the semi-major axis of which was very close to the value that the Titius-Bode Law predicted.

Beginning with Neptune, however, the semi-major axes fall well short of the Titius-Bode Law. Yet the table still shows an interesting pattern, in that the semi-major axes of Pluto and Eris are barely less than one-half the distances predicted by the Titius-Bode Law. Moreover the aphelion of Eris is almost double that for Pluto.

But a closer inspection of the distances for the last three planets reveals another interesting pattern: Pluto's orbit is very close to where Neptune's orbit ought to be--and Eris's orbit is less than 10 AU short of where Pluto's orbit ought to be.

Discussion

Technically, Neptune, Pluto, and Eris are in violation of the Titius-Bode Law. Remarkably, however, that law holds for all of the planets (plus the dwarf planet Ceres) inside of Neptune. And in the case of Pluto and Eris, those "violations," such as they are, are remarkably "regular." These are not the numbers of the random assortment of distances that one would expect from the nebula hypothesis of the formation of the sun and its satellites. Rather, these numbers suggest a catastrophic event in the distant past that altered the orbit of Neptune and either (a) also altered the orbits of Pluto and Eris, or else (b) injected those two dwarf planets into orbits that, while violative of the Titius-Bode Law, were nevertheless semi-regular. That the orbits of Pluto and Eris are the most steeply inclined of all the orbits of the satellites of the Sun (except for comets) is further suggestive evidence of catastrophe.

Conclusion

The Titius-Bode Law did not survive mainstream scrutiny, primarily because most astronomers regarded the more-inward position of Neptune as a fatal counterexample to it. But since that event, the scientific community has seen the discoveries, decades apart, of Pluto and Eris. These two dwarf world have vastly inclined and highly eccentric orbits that, nevertheless, have positions that would almost seem to conform to the Titius-Bode Law were Neptune not present. Findings like these cast doubt on the earlier decision to abandon this Law and suggest an alternative explanation: that God in fact set the planets in their orbits according to this Law, but a subsequent cataclysmic event or sequence significantly altered the elegant mathematical pattern of the outer reaches of the solar system.

Reference


Browse
Personal tools