Talk:Pseudoscience in the American Journal of Physics

Questions
There are a number of things in this article that are not clear to me. In particular, it's not clear what point it is trying to make: Or is this article claiming that Wikipedia is making a correct claim (that evolution does not violate the 2nd law) but for the wrong reason? If so, I disagree (that evolution does not violate the 2nd law).
 * Wikipedia quotes Entropy and evolution to show that "evolution does not violate" the 2nd Law.
 * "The second law does not apply to the evolution of stars". It doesn't (why not?), or Wikipedia claims it doesn't?
 * "The second law only applies to systems of non-interacting particles or entities." Huh?  According to whom?
 * "The second law also does not apply to evolution ..." Isn't that what Wikipedia is claiming, which this article is claiming is incorrect?

Philip J. Rayment 06:01, 1 February 2013 (PST)