User talk:TaeWoong

Korean Atom
I set it up while you were standing there. You can find the Korean link in the lower left menu on the atom page. I also uploaded the graphics on that page to the Pool, so they will work.

http://creationwiki.org/ko/원자

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 23:40, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Mr. Ashcraft, I'd like to translate more, I'll translate everything this site has. --TaeWoong 01:37, 6 October 2007 (EDT)

Great. Perhaps you could do the chemical element page next. You'll find that I've placed a link from the english page to the Korean page and back. This is done by placing a link at the bottom of the page on the english site like this ( 화학 원소 ), or by placing one on the Korean site like this ( chemical element ). The link causes the word "Korean", or "English" to be placed in the bottom-left menu, which is linked to the specified article title on the other site.

http://creationwiki.org/ko/화학_원소

I've also set up and partially translated a Periodic table page on the Korean site. You can work on it some also if you want.

http://creationwiki.org/ko/주기율표

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 10:08, 6 October 2007 (EDT).

Chemical element
Tae Woong - you accidentally added korean text to the English chemical element article. Look for the "Korean" link on the left-hand menu to do to the Korean version.--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 12:34, 7 October 2007 (EDT)

Image formatting
A number of help files have been created on the CreationWiki. Simply click the link that says help on the menu to the left. It will direct you to a table of contents where the Image help file is listed.--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 00:13, 13 October 2007 (EDT)

Periodic Table
Yes - That monday will be fine.

I did more work on the Periodic table page on the Korean site. I started changing the names of the elements in the table to Korean. You can get the names of the elements at the following link if you want to continue through the table.

http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EA%B8%B0%ED%98%B8_%EC%88%9C_%EC%9B%90%EC%86%8C_%EB%AA%A9%EB%A1%9D

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 22:41, 14 October 2007 (EDT)

== Section

''I've done uses section, but should I write one more section?, What I have are Introduction, properties, sources and uses; which are 4 sections total. How many sections should be done by Monday?, and do I have to make a reference from the text book, and the extra credit-chapter1, should I do chapter review as well? not only section assessment? --TaeWoong 21:15, 17 October 2007 (EDT)''

The intro section does not count as one of your 4. It should be written LAST, like I've said many times before. The intro should be done by Monday and a rough draft brought for peer reviews.

Yes - I want you to use your textbook as one of your references - if possible.

The chapter review is also part of the extra credit, but I think you are covered this quarter with the translations.

p.s. I configured another Period on the Korean Periodic Table. --Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

Help:Bible book translations
I just created that Help page. You will notice its long table giving the names of all the Books of the Bible as they are actually called in all the languages of CreationWiki.

I need you to translate that page into Korean for the Korean site. All you need to translate is the introductory and background text, plus one footnote buried in the row on the book of Isaiah. The table speaks for itself in all languages.--TemlakosTalk 13:38, 31 October 2007 (EDT)

Korean loggin
TaeWoong,

Translate this short administrative page on the CreationWiki. Its the text that is displayed when someone requests an account.

http://creationwiki.org/ko/MediaWiki:Loginend

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 08:35, 15 November 2007 (EST)

Sorry - didnt know you couldnt access the edit feature on that page. Here's the source code. Just translate it, and drop it on my talk page when your're done. Translate everything but the following - ( Special:RequestAccount ).

Autoregistration of 창조 위키 editors has been disabled. To join the editorial staff, send a request to the administration.

Note to Editors: All contributing editors must be creationists (i.e. those who believe the universe and life on earth were created by God). Non-creationists are prohibited from editing articles, except for spelling and grammar corrections. However, anyone is permitted to review articles using the discussion pages adjoining any specific article. Continued participation is reliant upon the careful observance of 창조 위키 policies and administrative instructions.

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 09:04, 17 November 2007 (EST)

Article - Science
This would be a good one to do (Science). I copied it to the Korean site already.

http://creationwiki.org/ko/%EA%B3%BC%ED%95%99

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 11:05, 19 November 2007 (EST)

choose another
That one is already done - choose another, then confirm that it does not exist on the CreationWiki.

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 19:31, 26 November 2007 (EST)

Compound
No. --Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 10:03, 27 November 2007 (EST)

Chembook
The link is on RenWeb. --Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2007 (EST)

Translations
Which of the CreationWiki articles did you translate?

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2008 (EST)

Mr.Ashcraft, I'm doing translating for the extra credit, now I'm working on Science.


 * OK - sounds good.... --Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 17:30, 21 March 2008 (PDT)

HCl
Its just HCl.

Sign your posts. I'm not psychic.

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 10:20, 25 March 2008 (PDT)

Translation
OK - Astronomy

http://creationwiki.org/ko/index.php/%EC%B2%9C%EB%AC%B8%ED%95%99

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 13:40, 13 April 2008 (PDT)

Battery & Astronomy
OK - battery is set up with some basic formatting help.

You can translate the Astronomy article.

http://creationwiki.org/ko/index.php/%EC%B2%9C%EB%AC%B8%ED%95%99

--Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 02:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

I noticed that you began translating the Astronomy article. But you seem to have begun translating the version stored on the English site. I moved your translations onto the Korean site and changed the English site back to the way it was.

Here's a good Interwiki link to the Astronomy article that you need to translate:

ko:천문학

You'll find your initial translations there, just as you had written them.

--TemlakosTalk 10:39, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

you list on the top the title of the article and where it was posted [example:TJ (16)1:51] and then write a summary that's about a paragraph or longer then write a paragraph on how it will be used for your project--KRiStA 05:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Printout
''Do I have to print out the papers that due on Monday? That's not a rough draft, so doesn't have to print it out?--TaeWoong 08:01, 23 November 2008 (UTC)''
 * Yes - you need to bring a printout.--Ashcraft - (talk) 15:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Reference
''Mr. Ashcraft, can one of my references be Korean web site? my topic is Cambrian, I got tons of references on English web sites. --TaeWoong 05:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)''

I guess it would be OK to use one Korean reference, but - tons? - at the moment I only see one reference used on your paper.

US gov sites should not be overlooked at possible sources for text or images.

http://www.nationalatlas.gov/articles/geology/legend/ages/cambrian.html

Cambrian fossil images here. http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/grte/grte_geology/sec6.htm

--Ashcraft - (talk) 17:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Listing links at the bottom of your page does not make them references. They should be listed under a heading that says "External links" unless actually used as a reference for the text. Only one of your currently listed references can be found as an in-text citation.

--Ashcraft - (talk) 14:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * There's another Cambrian globe pic here.

http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sect19/Sect19_2a.html

--Ashcraft - (talk) 20:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright violation
''Oh.. I see, I used several references, but I didn't set my page yet, there should be references that I used on my word processor. I'll fix it. By the way, what happened to my picture? you erased it, I forgot the reason.''

It was in violation of copyright law. The link above to the image at USGS is a public domain version that should be used instead.

p.s. Please sign your messages...

--Ashcraft - (talk) 17:52, 29 November 2008 (UTC)