Talk:Creation

I removed this part of the text:

"According to different radiometric dating methods (Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd, U-Pb) the earth has an age of approximately 4.6 Billion years."

I did it for the following reasons:

1) Without some explanatory context, it is out of place in a section called "other creation accounts", since it is not an account or story of creation, but simply a finding of scientists using naturalistic evolutionary bias. It is irrelevant to the topic of the article.

2)It would be better placed in a section concerning radiometric dating since then it would be relevant and it can be discussed in a more critical atmosphere and tested logically and against other experiments.

I won't deal with the issue as to whether it has any real truth value or deal with its logical failings. The main point is that it is out of place.

Amenyahu May 7 2006 14:04
 * Concur. The age of the Earth according to fundamentally flawed dating methods is not "another creation account."  And a great number of articles, including radiometric dating already include the information User:Scientist added.  Ungtss 13:14, 7 May 2006 (GMT)

Paul Concerning Creation
Testimony of the Apostle Paul Concerning Creation and Final Judgment

As related for events at Mars Hill in Athens, Greece...


 * This above text seems out-of-place in a section of "Creation Accounts". Perhaps it would be better placed in a page about idolatry. --Ashcraft - (talk) 14:45, 27 November 2011 (PST)