User talk:Hoffmann

You are not permitted to delete content on the CreationWiki. Report suspected vandalism where indicated, and allow the admins to investigate and take the appropriate action. --Chris Ashcraft 23:45, 19 January 2006 (GMT)
 * I apologise. I saw the content and thought it should be removed.  I'll report it in the future.PrometheusX303 01:44, 20 January 2006 (GMT)


 * A bush burns but is never consumed
 * A rod turns into a snake and back again
 * A sea is parted
 * Water from a rock
 * Three men are thrown into a furnace. The come out without even smelling of fire.
 * Men dead for three days come back to life
 * Water is turned to wine
 * A 5 loaves and 2 fish feed over 5 thousand; leftovers in greater amount than original meal
 * A man walks on water

All of the above acts defy science. Most Christians won't hesitate to believe they happened. Yet many of these same Christians deny the creation account and the Flood of Noah because "science" says differently. Why?

Whydoes "science" not fight tooth and nail against these?

I am kendemyer from TWEB. I will say that in regards to my blocking from posting to TWEB my warning level was 5 and I was told not to worry about it by a moderator. I was told you need to be given a level 10. I think TWEB leans anti YEC and my blocking was not in accordance with TWEB policy as far as the warning levels. Creationist 22:37, 14 January 2006 (GMT)creationist

Matrixes at TWEB end?
The anti-YECs are aggressive and numerous.

Next, You wrote:

"If you have a mind to come back after you matrix ends, just be careful. Paraphrase a sentence or two from the link.  Maybe that'll work."

Matrixes end? Could you explain?

Next, thanks for your compliments on my stuff here.

Creationist 23:15, 14 January 2006 (GMT)creationist

postscript
Given I was matrixed at warning level 5 and supposedly you are not matrixed until level 10 I am thinking TWEB ownership may lean anti-YEC. I told TWEB what happened and nobody seems to care.

On the other hand, I did argue against preterism which is a errant eschatology and I don't think Dee Dee Warren a owner of TWEB liked it. So maybe Dee Dee Warren and others are looking the other way while the moderating policy is being violated.

On the plus side I am corresponding with a owner of a site which links to TWEB in a big way about my matrixing and he is a YEC. Perhaps he will use his leverage to get me unmatrixed.

23:26, 14 January 2006 (GMT)creationist

Holding
I spent a considerable amount of time defending Holding when a joker was attacking Holding by having a www.tektonics.com site. (his site is www.tektonics.org  )and at Wikipedia. But Holding seems to be saying he doesn't know if he can help me in regards to TWEB. He may pull though and maybe I am not giving him a chance though. But he is saying things like "I think you think I have more influence at TWEB then I really do" or "I need to know the moderator who did this before I can help you" etc etc.

The fact is that Holding has a lot of clout at TWEB. His site gets 1,000,000 hits a month and his site prominently links to TWEB. Holding is the big fish and TWEB is the guppy getting Holding's site overflow. And I think the truth is that TWEB has a lot of nasty people and without Holding linking to TWEB that TWEB would not be growing but losing members.

Holding has featured my material at his site. Holding and I have corresponded a lot. Holding has helped me. Holding linked to my CreationWiki "Bible scientific foreknowledge" article at 5 places at his website.

But here is the problem. If one person gets duped in Darwinism because of Holding's close connections to TWEB then that is one person too many. And I think in the West many people get duped. And I think TWEB is heavy handed to YECs.

Creationist 23:44, 14 January 2006 (GMT)creationist

Replacing Holding
I admit Holding offers a very good resource on Bible inerrancy. I will beef up the Bible inerrancy section to compensate for my deleting of the Holding links I had put in earlier. Creationist 01:22, 15 January 2006 (GMT)creationist

I restored the Holding link and beefed up inerrancy section
I restored the Holding link and beefed up inerrancy section. Thanks for the request to restore Holding. But I also inserted a TWEB protest on the discussion forum. Creationist 02:02, 15 January 2006 (GMT)creationist

regarding probe ministries
I think Probe Ministries is apologetic resource that is not well known but has some jewels. I hope you liked the jewels I offered! :)

Lastly, I think I am taking a CreationWiki vacation that might be permanent. Thank you for you kind messages that had some good advice (Like restoring the Holding Links). By the way, Holding is trying or has tried at least to get me back at TWEB.

Here is a sneak preview of a thread which I may introduce to TWEB in the future:

Non Creationist Biology Is A Mess http://www.apologetics.org/cslewis/viewtopic.php?t=2994

Prome theus  -X303-  20:01, 17 March 2006 (GMT)

I have a lot on my plate and I don't think I will be contributing to CreationWiki now ...
Thanks for your suggestion on me contributing to CreationWiki in regards to responses to EvoWiki on "The Bible contains knowledge showing scientific understanding beyond the knowledge at the time". I just wanted to say though at this time I have a lot on my plate and won't be contributing much to CreationWiki. I am thinking of not making any more contributions to CreationWiki but perhaps I will make a few more edits. Creationist 20:13, 18 April 2006 (GMT)creationist

Wikipedia erased the article on CreationWiki
Wikipedia erased the article on CreationWiki. I created a new article on CreationWiki but it was erased again. Creationist 22:57, 7 October 2006 (EDT)creationist

Accurate e-mail
Mr. Ashcraft, I attempted to send you an e-mail last night via the address you give on this page , but the mail was returned. The reason was Status: 5.0.0 550_no_such_user_here. PrometheusX303 16:29, 11 October 2007 (EDT)


 * Thanks. I've been trying to reduce some of the spam and had disallowed that domain address. I forgot it was listed there. Its the same with the .org instead. --Mr. Ashcraft - (talk) 17:43, 11 October 2007 (EDT)