Talk:Evolution will soon be widely rejected (Talk.Origins)

I think it would help to include reference links at the points shown. That way, those who read the page can quickly verify our claim.

PrometheusX303 22:42, 11 May 2006 (GMT)


 * Yeah, okay. The first point that you suggest referencing is actually referring to this T.O. response.  I have edited the article to make that clearer.  The second I did from memory, but have done a hunt and have found a reference.  Do you think I'm representing them fairly?
 * Philip J. Rayment 10:14, 12 May 2006 (GMT)


 * I thought that I had seen the first point in another claim. Representing them fairly? I think so.  Often in their zeal to debunk creationist claims and effort to "beef up" their own position, they contradict themselves, though it's not always obvious. PrometheusX303 16:41, 12 May 2006 (GMT)


 * Perhaps it is in another claim as well? If you come across it again, we might add a reference to it to this article.
 * Philip J. Rayment 06:49, 13 May 2006 (GMT)
 * Philip J. Rayment 06:49, 13 May 2006 (GMT)