Opinion:Claim CF011 (Talk.Origins)

Claim
In the Claim CF011., Talk Origins stated that:

Answer
This answer is just a distraction. The complexity of the fitness function was simply transferred to a decision problem (yes / no). It continues directly related to the complexity, ie, it does not lose its complexity because it turned into a decision problem. In fact, the fitness function must be translated into a quantity: number of descendents. And to calculate this quantitative return, the function would have to be as complex as the specificity of the power of selection that it would have. If we transfer the intelligence to the environment, you must embed complexity in the environment to shape better outcomes. In this case the environment would be increasingly clever to produce more complex products. In the example below we extended the increasing complexity of the environment in the same way the fitness function. We begin with a series of numbers and we will increase the complexity of the list until the list of primes ordered and no gaps in its sequence.

Conclusion
This is a simple example of how the fitness function (or ambient intelligence) should grow as the complexity of the result increases. Thus, while creationists proposes an "intelligent designer", the Talk.Origins states such a thing like an "intelligent environment". One must keep in mind that whatever the proposed source of intelligence, it (or He) had to be able to create brains that solve Fourier series, Laplace transforms, and so on

pt:Ensaio:Alegação CF011 (Talk.Origins)