Talk:Planet formation

Recommend deleting this: it's superfluous. "However, problems exist in both perspectives. Evolutionists and nonbelievers do not believe that God created the universe and they do not think there is enough evidence to support the biblical perspective. Then, creationists and believers do not believe that planets are created from the Big Bang because, if they created from the same explosion, then they should have same conditions, but they do not." Location: opening paragraph: --EriK 17:42, 1 September 2010 (PDT)

This likewise means nothing, and serves to obfuscate the issue: "To evolutionists or people who believe evolutionism, Genesis 2:1-2 means nothing, because there is no evidence or any simulation that evolutionary models have. However, to creationists or people who believe creationism, the Bible is fact and the truth, also they believe the Bible as history book of the universe full of evidence."

Who wrote this page?

This caption makes me question whether the writer's primary language is English: "Black Hole is the example of the accretion."

Um....after reading the rest, I'm just facepalming here. This needs to be edited for content and language used. Several statements seem antagonistic to Creation and obfuscate the issue. Somebody please review.

You gotta sign your comments at the end of the comment. Also, check history of the article in question to see who wrote it.--Tony 19:28, 1 September 2010 (PDT)